Wikipedia can be a runner maze, there are so many guidelines and policies and much more about how to edit that one can easily get lost into it. Even the most professional wiki editors get confused and engage in disputes for the explanation of the rules.
So Wikipedia is not easier to edit. There are several policies that get contributed every day and the explanations of them are limitless. So as a matter of fact, a number of enterprises find a solution for Wikipedia writers for hire and get the appropriate content posted on the website.
Individuals usually don’t give a second thought that regardless of getting something contributed on Wikipedia, there might never be a guarantee that the same will remain on the website. There can be a number of reasons, however, the most common might be the subject not notable enough.
And this is the point where things become complex even the notable pages are often times deleted in the Wikipedia.
Evaluating what it takes to be enough recognized for Wikipedia is the fundamental to create a Wikipedia page. If a topic is not notable, there are higher chances of it to be deleted. So the very basic thing is to check as if you qualify for the Wikipedia page. If you are not notable enough then there is no sense into getting into the details regarding the time frame, cost and the relative creation process.
Well if you are not enough recognized and still want to appear on the Wikipedia
It’s true that even the highly recognized pages get deleted often times. However, why this could have happened if the page is enough high profile then it needs to be allowed on Wikipedia as it appears in the policies.
Though it’s all correct, however, there are few things that must be acknowledged. There is the chances that the page is written in a profile raising tone or there is no strong why it’s recognized. There can be the reason that the page has the shortage of strong references and editors neglect the policy of in-depth research.
Another reason why the notable pages are usually deleted are since people engage in the discussion that they have lesser knowledge and have no understanding of the topic.
Though thousands of people edit Wikipedia, there are usually only a few who take part in the deletion discussion at any time given.
Hence some pages get deleted since people are not acknowledged enough and familiar with the topic they are keen in joining the deletion process.
Wikipedia is not your own website, so don’t try to steer
Wikipedia is the project initiated by the collaboration, that interpret many people have the access to potentially contribute to the page you wish to create or edit.
The media means that you own means you have a 100% governance, Wikipedia is not the one you expect such things. It’s an open platform and anyone can make contributions so whatever the contributions made can be erased tomorrow.
Individuals and even enterprises don’t often get the point, they have a common misconception that they can govern every contribution made on Wikipedia as they are the subject of the page. This is the only thing that Wikipedia professional desire to allow. As a matter of fact that the wiki community want to stay aloof of the page if it’s about you.
Keep in thoughts that Wikipedia works on harmony that translates that the editors as the only means are the decisive authorities what remains on the page as per their interpretation policies and guidelines. If you keep contributing to the page and the editors find it inappropriate then there are higher chances that it will be removed.
That is the reason many experts don’t recommends Wikipedia as a reputation building tool. no doubt that you can create the page with the optimistic information, however, you might not be able to control other people from contributing to the negative aspects, as long as they have strong references and comply with the guidelines of the Wikipedia.
If a contribution complies to the guideline might also be deleted?
Its’ quite common to expect and happens in many cases. This might be difficult to understand and there is always the possibility that the public might decide against you. Even though your edits comply with the guidelines and you are accurate in making through it, a community of editors can have an opposition for you.
Make yourself sure that there is nothing as mine and yours and when it’s the question of Wikipedia as defined earlier, it is a harmonious project. Since the subject is related to you there are no possibilities that you can steer who controls it.